Browsing the archives for the meta-posts category.


administrivia

meta-posts, trivia

Comments now support OpenID, threading, and email notifications. Replies to top-level comments will indent, and commenters can be notified of replies. There’s also a reputation system.

I’m very excited about it, anyway.

Comments

so this is the new year

grand plans for the future, meta-posts

I hate to run a blog where all the posts have apologies for not blogging. Unfortunately, that’s what I seem to have. I like having a blog more than I like writing in it (or maintaining it, if I can judge by the nag box in the Wordpress dashboard).

So here’s my resolution: One post, every month, for the rest of 2009. More is good, but not expected.

I’ll try what the pro bloggers suggest, even if it gives me hives: a schedule. *gasp!* Yes. I’ll prepare something in advance and post it, oh, around the 10th of the month.

Look for something new here then. I mean it this time.

Comments

the big reveal

grand plans for the future, meta-posts

I was going to write about how I’ve been else-net all this time and am trying to start again here, but I’ve written that before. Including two months ago.

I’ve struggled for a long time — the consequence of which is the dearth of posts here — about how to present myself online. That’s based in a belief that my natural offline self isn’t fit for public consumption, and that what I have to present elsewhere is the radio edit, so to speak. And despite the fact that this blog has been mostly silent for two years (twice as long as it was active), I thought the peoples expected Shakespeare. What peoples were still reading, anyway.

But the truth of the matter is that this site is mine, to do with as I please, and if I’m done talking about Shakespeare? My seven RSS readers can choose to keep reading or stop. I don’t have to edit myself.

That’s been a big revelation to me.

So has the dwindling pull of the internets. Matt and I went to see our families in Michigan over Thanksgiving, and I was surprised to find that I didn’t itch to be online, nor did that itch necessarily return when we got back home. Catching up became a chore, not a treat. And I’m not into continuing things I used to like when I stop liking them.

I can’t tell what the future holds. I’m kinda frustrated with the number of “starting on Monday, things are gonna change” posts I’ve made here. But I am determined to put down roots elsewhere online. Eventually, those roots will take hold.

Comments

the best-laid plans

meta-posts, trivia

Despite the excellent renewal system my library has, I wasn’t able to read through How to Read Literature Like a Professor before I had to return it. Sorry that hasn’t come through.

My work has quickly changed from allowing me some leisure time during the day to demanding my full attention, plus overtime. This has the dual effect of eliminating my usual writing hours and making me less interested in writing or critical reading when I do have the time. (I’m even behind on new episodes of CSI.)

Therefore, I shall point to the Blogging Without Obligation button in the left sidebar and restate (if only to myself) that if I only post twice a month, that’s OK. I’ll come back to it when I can.

Comments

“For such as we are made of, such we be.”

grand plans for the future, meta-posts

Welcome to the latest and greatest incarnation of lastsyllable.net. Things have changed in the blogosphere since I stopped writing in it — I haven’t quit writing entirely; I just tend to hang out else-net — and again, I’m hesitant to return. The proper tone of accessibility, vast learnings, and not too much navel-gazing is a difficult one to nail on the first several tries.

According to a Wired post by Paul Boutin, I’m supposed to let the blog die and go write on Twitter and Facebook. Twitter hasn’t captured my interest, and on Facebook I mostly like to change my status message and play Tetris Friends. And as John Scalzi pointed out when he linked Boutin’s post, his advice applies if you’re only in the blogosphere to get hundreds of readers or make a big splash on Technorati and similar. I’m not.

I have to admit that my original experiment with this blog was a success — turns out I wasn’t interested enough in Shakespeare as a field to sustain writing about it for a very long time. I probably saved myself thousands of dollars in grad school tuition by starting this blog. However, I had a lot of fun writing about Richard III during the Blogathon (those posts are now readable on one page), and I’d like to do it again with other plays.

The Shakespeare blogosphere is still pretty small, though I’m pleased to discover an ongoing Shakespeare Blog Carnival. Watch for an upcoming post listing Shakespeare blogs of the moment, as well as updated sidebar links. In the meantime, I’ll be easing back into the literary blogosphere through the book How to Read Literature Like a Professor. I expect to quarrel with parts, depending on author Thomas Foster’s critical perspective, so it should be at least as entertaining as descriptions of my daily minutiae.

Comments
« Older Posts